Numerous psychological studies show that we are not only all vulnerable to this false information but that it also represents one of the major obstacles to engaging in actions to mitigate climate change. Understanding around the climate is used is therefore essential. Is it simply a protective mechanism to avoid the anxiety of catastrophe and "the uncomfortable contradiction between our behaviors and the climate emergency" , as described by Pierre André, a PhD student in philosophy , in the magazine Le Un devoted to climate, or is it a conscious political agenda that goes against any notion of climate justice? For Nicole de Almeida, "climate skepticism is a bonus for inertia" and benefits those who do not want to change.
Social networks, amplifiers of noise… Facebook, Twitter pakistan whatsapp number data 5 million and TikTok are cultivating – and feeding off – a new distrust of the scientific community that is part of the crisis of confidence in all institutions. Everything is equal, everything can be said. Thanks to social networks, there is a “gigantic conversation that has taken place on a global scale, where all voices are enlisted. the voice of scientists, the voice of politicians […] and the voice of young people, of women.
A snowball effect that contributes to a cacophony where everything and its opposite can be said ,” describes Nicole de Almeida. It has long been known that social media algorithms cherish divisive information, especially when it is false. And it is now clear that social media is not doing enough to combat climate misinformation. A report published in April by the association Avaaz and the US branches of Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace analyzed the efforts of social media, looking in particular at whether the platforms worked with experts to identify false information on the climate, whether they had implemented a clear policy to reduce this content, or whether they suspended accounts that regularly spread it.