It's called civic education

[roseline371274]

In France, this subject exists. Yes, it does. And while everyone debates citizenship at school, no one talks about it. In fact, no one cares so much that there aren't any dedicated teachers for it. It's passed on to the History and Geography teachers (them again! But everyone knows they're the superior race), and it's up to them to teach it—or not, that way, there are more hours to complete the History and Geography curriculum—all with a curriculum that ranges from vague to completely rotten, including various variations of crap. It's up to the teacher to sort it out. It's therefore simply wonderful to see that the champions of education, the debate whatsapp number list thugs who have made civics their hobbyhorse, have simply forgotten that this subject exists. That's how interested they must be in it. But hey, it lets you show off, it's nice. I'm looking forward to someone discovering that Euclid is no longer studied in History, and that despite everything, mathematics is mysteriously taught in mathematics classes.

This doesn't mean that it's good to ignore the Enlightenment, eh, I insist because I can sense the thieves who will have read diagonally (surely a bad learning at school). But just that we should stop using moldy arguments to defend the question.

"  Yes, finally, my dear sir," I will be told, "you yourself are carefully forgetting to point out that part of the reform is precisely about Civic Education! Aha, feint, old fox!  " It's true: we're changing the name to call it  moral and civic education . And be careful, eh, there again, we're putting a high level into it. To us, the Enlightenment! To us, the critical spirit! In a world full of traps, let's guide our young people towards the future! Let me quote some of the elements taken from the program:

Culture of sensitivity.

Being able to identify and name one's emotions and feelings.

Care: Becoming aware of your body through dance.
There must be some great deals on crack pipes, because I don't know about you, but I didn't really get the impression until now that the real problem in our societies was the ability to find one's own legs or to replace "  Fuck you, bastard  " with "  Fuck you, bastard, I'm angry.  " But maybe I missed something again? Am I living in a parallel dimension where we have other, much more direct questions?

Technically, it's history AND dance. I think it'll be on the baccalaureate exam soon.
For example, remember in January: following the Paris attacks, discussed in classes, there was a wave of indignation: some children had made comments that were not in line with the school's intentions! In case of doubt, they were thrown in the hole (but they were later taken out, the little arms). Which still shows that in terms of civic education, we are starting from a long way off. But in short: how did these children come up with this speech? Quick, something must be done.