siloed and difficult to work with

Discover, discuss, and innovate with consumer data systems.
Post Reply
shamimhasan07
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2024 3:32 am

siloed and difficult to work with

Post by shamimhasan07 »

Johan Hanegraaff: Co-founder of Arkio
For us, the future of BIM is to make the same information model available to multiple participants. So, instead of re-creating models and documents for each stage of the project, the same data can be used throughout the entire life cycle of the building.

We’ve seen how cloud data sharing and real-time visualization have made existing BIM tools more accessible. But most design applications are still .

Currently, design and solution approval processes still mostly happen via email, chat, and paper, which phone number singapore puts collaboration on models on the back burner. If we can collaborate on models in real time, we can make the design process much easier. To ensure the ability to work from any device and prevent duplication of tasks, model data must be freely streamed between design solutions and databases.

Headsets for entering virtual and augmented reality spaces, such as Apple Vision Pro and Meta Quest 3, allow us to move away from traditional 2D interfaces and workflows and bring information models into the real world. Compared to traditional tools, these immersive devices provide a more natural interaction between the eyes and hands on 3D models and facilitate collaboration. Artificial intelligence will further improve the design process by inspiring new ideas and automating spatial design processes. We can’t wait to spread these technologies and move BIM from the limitations of flat screens into the era of spatial computing!

Conclusion
In the history of computing, platform changes (from Unix to DOS, from DOS to Windows) have always been the moment when market-leading applications become most vulnerable. This is one of the key reasons why Autodesk dove headfirst into cloud-based applications to beat everyone to the punch in MCAD with Fusion. But why did the company fail? Were customers not ready for cloud-based applications? Or were feature-rich desktop applications still more popular? Even when Fusion was priced at a whopping $50 a month, with features for running $10,000 CNC machines, it had no impact on Solidworks.

So what will be different about the move to the cloud in construction? The first thing I would note is that the industry’s leading players are actively pursuing this technology transition, rather than waiting to be overtaken. Autodesk’s Forge (APS) platform for cloud software development is already quite mature. And while Autodesk started with Fusion, the team has also spent years developing web services like Autodesk BIM 360 and Autodesk Construction Cloud. With Forma, they can begin working on migrating their customers’ BIM data to a new unified database, which will ultimately reduce Revit’s file load and speed up its performance.
Post Reply